Liberty Defense League

James P. Harvey
May 19, 2010

In part one of this article, I eluded to the fact that early America prospered because of the availability of lesser educated men willing to work with their hands at jobs requiring diverse mechanical aptitude. Many millions of them were from other nations, and contributed to our grocery basket of human culture, but one and all had the same dream.

The opportunity to work at honest labor and earn their own way was intellectually intoxicating, and the thought of one day owning their own business was enough to drive them to near suicidal effort. Most were honest, hard working family men, and the ability to support, love, and protect their family was their greatest joy. Does that sound like a good base to build a stable society on? It does to me. I have worked with men like them most of my life, and remain unfit to clean their work boots.

Had they been respected by their government, and encouraged to protect their future by thrifty living, saving their money, and home schooling their children, it may have been impossible to manipulate our society into self destruction. Today, we have a working class society that is convinced they can do nothing to control our government, and there is no sense in trying. I agree: our governments on all levels is beyond our control, and a systematic abandonment of the entire system is in order, but our greatest asset for the rebuilding and preservation of freedom is in the hands and skills of the working class, and they won’t participate until they see a realistic opportunity to regain their dream. Honest work, family, and their own home.

Call them anything you please, but remember this, you won’t create anything new without them to drive the nails, haul out the trash, and when needed, give their life. All of the great minds involved in writing about Americas decline and what needs to be done to restore, or create a controllable government, would be more productive if they could design a state economy that had jobs for the working class, because that is how to wake up the masses. They will risk anything to continue their dream, and they will do anything to rebuild it, but you won’t budge them with empty words, and you won’t convince those who have acquired wealth to risk it by opposing the most despicable government in the history of tyrannical governments.

One other thing: don’t confuse the working class as a whole, with the cognitive dissonant tea party folks, they still believe D.C. is fixable, and only serve to further distance the masses. The only power that is available to stand up to D.C. is in those people I respectfully call the masses, and the only way to deal with them is to provide a means of regaining their dream, and then leaving them to hell alone. They detest governments of all kinds, and anyone that implies they should participate in the body politic. After what I have observed in my life time, I’m inclined to agree.

Anyone willing to do the research can find plenty of evidence that our so called founders and their wonderful constitution did just exactly what it was designed to do from the get go: fool the people into believing they were protected by it. That we swallowed the myth will go down in history as the greatest con ever conceived. How so many really intelligent people lost their lives from defending a piece of paper that fooled most of them, is a real lesson to be retained in the construction of the next great experiment in mans struggle to replace God with their own government.

I suggest that we proceed with caution, and fervent prayer. (Defending my theological conclusions is not germane to the article) What I do want to be clear about is the suffering humanity has endured from governments that people claimed were ordained by God for our protection.

Suffice to say, this old man has become very skeptical concerning mans ability to govern his self, and I feel strongly that much caution is in order as we contemplate how to escape tyranny. The road to destruction is slick and paved with egos, and there is plenty of history to prove it.

Getting back to the power of profit, and mans insane pursuit of it. I have concluded that the international bankers have proven beyond doubt that the pursuit of profit is the driving force of a depraved humanity, and with much caution and forethought, it can be used for good rather than evil–such as, creating an incentive to relocate thousands of workers in certain areas, by creating jobs for them and receiving their unintended support in return. Remember, we’re building a totally new government here, and new possibilities exist. Perhaps a study of the success that private businessmen and women enjoyed during Americas early years is in order. As I understand it, we had a thriving economy before corporations became persons.

That brings me to accountability, and mans desire to escape it, and the use of law to enable him to escape it. It seems we have a consistent problem with man wanting to get rich off of other peoples labor, and remain unaccountable to any and all injury. So now, we also have the problem of creating a whole new legal system, and one that everyone can understand. Let’s be real folks; we can’t use the enemy’s legal system.

By now, you may think I am surreptitiously trying to prove secession is impossible. Not so! I want a free State as much as any man alive, but it is evident that little effort has been expended in the area of itemizing the problems that need to be overcome if we are going to succeed, and much effort has been wasted in trying to use a system of law we are rejecting as being illegitimate. The process I’m calling for is consistent with all problem solving, but requires many more than one person to complete it. This is only one of many web sites involved in the secession movement. Consider what we could accomplish with our own think tank that focused on one problem at a time.

If secession is to be accomplished, independent State banks are an absolute necessity, for as long as the Federal Reserve exists it has the power to economically control commerce in the states, and prevent the common man from profiting in free enterprise. Without this incentive, new state governments will not attract the one and only class willing to risk their lives.